All Saints Day: The Church of Foolish Lovers

image courtesy zacmcintosh.comNote: Since writing this post I’ve done some additional reading and I now doubt the report (from church historian Eusebius) that Origen castrated himself.  My apologies to my brother Origen for passing that story on!  11/1/2014

Frederick Buechner said that God “makes his saints out of fools and sinners because there is nothing much else to make them out of.”  It’s a line I quote often, partly because, as a fool and a sinner myself, I find it consoling.  But I also find myself drawn like a magnet toward the most foolish of saints in the history of the church.  The stranger they seem, the fonder I am of them.

I’m teaching a church history class, and devoted attention to Origen in a recent lesson.  Yes, he was an incredibly prolific biblical scholar, but he was also a bit loony.  When his father was arrested and taken away to martydom, the teenage Origen was eager to share in his father’s fate.  Legend tells us that his mother kept the boy from running after his father by hiding all of Origen’s clothing, knowing that his extreme sense of Christian modesty would keep him in the house.  That may be only legend, but it’s better established that Origen castrated himself in a rather literal application of Matthew 19:12.   Even in a church that revered the celibate, self-mutilation was not encouraged, and Origen’s bishop heartily disapproved. (See note above!)

I, too, disapprove of self-mutilation, just to be clear.  But I have a tender spot in my heart for the reckless devotion that motivated it, in Origen’s case.  It reminds me of St. Francis kissing a leper or publicly divesting himself of his father’s wealth, right down to the clothes on his back (Francis doesn’t seem to have shared Origen’s sense of modesty).   Church history is full of such figures, and I can’t pretend to relate to their specific experiences – to Simeon Stylites on his pillar,  St. Teresa in her ecstasy, Margery Kempe fainting at the sight of a crucifix, or Peter Maurin living out his cheerful asceticism.  But I find in all of them the ardor of true love, and lovers often look foolish to the observer.

Origen is remembered, in part, for being a universalist.  Long before Rob Bell scandalized the church anew, Origen believed that love would win, that all creation – all of it – would ultimately be reconciled to God through Christ.  As Bruce Shelley writes, Origen turned “a desire into a doctrine”, and went beyond orthodoxy in the process.  But in Origen’s writings I hear the voice of a lover who believes the very best about his Beloved, and I am in sympathy.  I hear that same lover’s optimism in Wesley’s pursuit of Christian perfection, and in Gladys Aylward’s determination to be a missionary without qualifications or support.  True love’s gestures become humiliations if the love is not returned, but the good news for the saints is that not only is the love returned, but we were loved first.

Sunday is All Saints Day, and we will remember the diverse gallery of the faithful, including the “crazy” saints:  Anthony in his cave, fighting demons;  Thomas Aquinas, driving temptation away with a hot poker; Kevin, hurling himself naked into a nettle patch.  We’ll also celebrate the respectable saints, of course.  But my prayers will include gratitude for the saints who got carried away, who were a little over the top, who loved beyond wisdom and good judgment.  Those of us who have been in love know what that’s like, and we know that our Beloved understands.


About Sharon Autenrieth

Wife, mom to 5, homeschooler, Christian Education Director, idealist, malcontent, follower of Jesus.
This entry was posted in church, history, holidays, religion, spirituality and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to All Saints Day: The Church of Foolish Lovers

  1. Isabella says:

    `But I find in all of them the ardor of true love, and lovers often look foolish to the observer.`A great post, Sharon! Here`s to that glorious communion of saints – especially the fools and sinners who give us hope that we, too, will join them one day. 🙂


  2. james potts says:

    One Problem is the stated fact, “but it’s a well established fact that Origen castrated himself in a rather literal application of Matthew 19:12” is in fact not a fact at all. There is no record that this happened but certainly there is speculation that distractors were the source. Now anyone who has bothered to read any of Oregin’s writings would know how adamant Oregin was that Matthew 19:12 not be taken literally. Because of the fact that you represent something not known to be a fact as a fact discredits really anything else you write.


    • Hm. Well, I appreciate your holding me to a high standard when it comes to accuracy, but you seem a little adversarial in your approach. Origen wrote about a lot more than Matt. 19:12, so it’s a bit of a leap to assume I haven’t read ANY of his writings based on my passing on what is commonly treated as an actual event. Could you tell me which of his writings you’re referring to that specifically addresses that passage? I’d love to look it up.

      My other thought is that I was making a larger point in this post. Can you hear it? Do you disagree with it? It will not offend me in any way if you DO disagree, but you seem more interested in arguing than engaging. And I’m not sure why that’s the case.

      Thanks for reading!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s